212-LAWYERS or (212) 344-1000

Can You File a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit after the Permitted Time is Over

In the state of New York, you can bring a case of medical malpractice against a municipal hospital within 90 days of the wrongdoing. However, what happens if these 90 days have passed and the victim wants to file a lawsuit? There are certain provisions in the law that will allow a medical malpractice victim still to file a lawsuit, but the procedure can be quite challenging and there are chances of the court not permitting the lawsuit.

Surgical black box device

New York residents may benefit if the surgical tracking box ever makes it to market in the U.S. According to CNN, researchers in Canada are currently developing a device that would be analogous to the black box recorder used in the aircraft industry. However, the surgical black box will not only record errors, but it may be able to help surgeons avoid from committing errors as well. While many praise the educational component of the new tool, others have cited potential legal issues.

What should You do when the Defense Shoots Down Your Settlement Claim

You may have an eligible case of personal injury or malpractice that you are suing for damages in the court. But be assured that the defense lawyers will always begin by saying that the settlement you are claiming is way too much for the defendant to pay; even if it is proved fair and square […]

Almost all Types of Lawyers come Across Instances of Medical Malpractice

Unfortunately, even with the improved technology and better hospitals, medical malpractice is still a very large problem. In fact, all types of lawyers come across clients who have suffered due to medical malpractice and have to guide them to the proper lawyer who specializes in such cases. For instance, you could be a lawyer specializing in workers compensation and you might be handling a case where the employee of a construction company has sustained a crushing injury to his arm from a forklift.

Admitting Liability in a Medical Malpractice Case

In most medical malpractice cases, the defending doctor has failed to provide the required standard of care, which has resulted in harm to the patient. In certain cases, the liability is obvious, and the defendant’s lawyer might even recognize and agree that the doctor had clearly departed from providing good medical care. However, in most cases the doctor’s lawyer will not admit this in court and will waste time trying to prove to the court that the doctor was not responsible for the malpractice and the resulting injuries to the patient.

Dental Malpractice – A Violation of Basic Standard of Care

A simple medical or dental procedure can go horribly wrong, when basic standard of care is violated by the doctor or dentist. Due to this, the case of the patient becomes much more complicated, and the remedial measures to correct the original mistake are not only expensive, but can also cause lot of emotional trauma and physical suffering to the patient. This is a classic case of medical malpractice, where the complications could have been avoided if the doctor had not violated basic standard of care.

Risks Involved with Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery

Laparoscopic gynecological surgery is an advanced alternative to open surgery and it is used in many cases, for both diagnostic and surgical procedures. The use of laparoscopy takes away the need for open abdominal and vaginal surgery. Cyst removal, tubal ligation, and hysterectomy procedures can be performed easily with this method. Normally, it is quite safe and effective as well.

How does Challenge for Cause Work during Jury Selection in a Medical Malpractice Case

The process of empanelling a jury is one of the most important pre-trial processes for any lawyer. The techniques of choosing jury members from the venire pool, known as voir dire in legal parlance, is taught to law students so that they can use it effectively in all their cases. One of the techniques used in the selection process is the ‘challenge for cause’. It is an effective method that medical malpractice lawyers can use to screen potential jurors before empanelling.